Skip to main content

The Bible, Teresa of Avila, and.. TWICE?


 



GOD’S UNEXPECTED PRESENCE IN A POP SONG

The Venerable Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen has written in his book Life of Christ that “Divinity is always where one least expects to find it.”[i] Sure, one might think we can find God in prayer, or when we gather in church every Sunday, or when one reads his written word, but to find His presence… in a K-pop song?! Surely one has to be out of his mind to think so.

But if God really is omnipresent, then He can use anything and everything to reveal Himself. I mean, He once spoke through an ass’s mouth (Numbers 22:21-39), so what’s stopping Him from speaking through Sana Minatozaki and Momo Hirai? Absolutely nothing, I would say. This (and I say this with full conviction) is what happens to me when I listen to a song by K-pop group TWICE called Alcohol-Free, a song they released just this year. The song has proved the archbishop’s words right. I found Divinity where I least expect it to be in.

The lyrics of the chorus is particularly striking:


I am alcohol-free but I get drunk (Drunk, drunk)
Though I did not drink at all (At all)
It happens whenever I'm with you (Whenever, whenever)
Because of the way you look at me

You are my champagne, my wine I drink with my eyes
My tequila, margarita
Mojito with lime
Sweet mimosa, piña colada

I'm drunk in you (I'm drunk in you)
I'm drunk in you (I'm drunk in you)

 

The song compared the presence of one’s beloved and his love to the intoxication one gets when one drinks alcohol excessively. There’s something about love that gives us great delight – a delight that is no less than the delight that wine gives – every time we gaze at the one(s) we admire. Whoever wrote the said TWICE song has described such an experience in a magnificent way, at least to me.

But what people might not realize is that this alcohol imagery or analogy used in describing love/the beloved is not original to TWICE. No, it isn’t them not any other song writer or pop star who used the imagery first. As a matter of fact, the analogy between wine and love is rooted in Scripture and the saints of the Church throughout the years were aware of this and used it in many of their writings and preaching. They particularly saw wine and the delight we get from it as a fitting earthly representation of God’s Love for all of us.

A LOVE THAT IS BETTER THAN WINE

For your love is better than wine

- Song of Songs 1:2

          I must admit that the imagery of wine – not only in the Song of Songs particularly but also in the Bible as a whole – is something that fascinates me to a great degree. That sweetness and warmth in the mouth and in the throat! That joy of being able to drink it with friends and family! The fact that the love of the bridegroom is even better than that! How can we even begin to fathom it!

          Maybe we can begin be stating an obvious fact about wine: that when it is consumed to a great degree, it can be intoxicating. The effects of wine can go beyond the stomach. It can greatly influence our thinking and willing. It can make us “step outside ourselves” in the sense of losing our own identity, at least temporarily. In other words, it makes us “crazy” (We will return to this theme of craziness later). That’s basically what drunkenness is.

          This fact might indeed be the reason why the wine imagery in the Bible may seem so strange to many people, including (and may be even especially) Christians. Isn’t it that getting drunk is a sin? Isn’t getting intoxicated an offense against God? If so, then why would the Bible speak so positively about wine? Why, for instance, would the prophet Joel describe the coming of the Messiah as the day when the “mountains shall drip sweet wine” (Joel 3:18)? Why would Isaiah describe the future of salvation as a time when the Lord will make a “feast (for all peoples with) rich food… (and) well-matured wines” (Isaiah 25:6)? And, more importantly for our discussion, why would the beloved in the Song of Songs compare the love of her lover with wine? Why would the lover compare his beloved’s kisses with “the best wine” (Song of Songs 7:9)?

          There may be two answers to this. The first is the fact that, although getting drunk is a sin, drinking wine in and of itself isn’t. There’s nothing wrong with simply drinking any type of liquor as long as it doesn’t cloud one’s rationality.

          The second answer may be the more important point that we should reflect on, and it is this: that everything in this world, whether good or bad, serves God and his good plan in their own way. This is obvious with the good things, but maybe not so much with the bad things. The problem of evil in philosophy and theology is obviously such a big issue, so we can hardly scratch the surface here. Anyhow, let me just put it this way: bad things, or what we also call “evil,” do not have existence in themselves. All they can do is exist in good things, and thus ultimately point to these good things. The reason for these is because “God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good” (Genesis 1:31). Evil, then, originally has no place in creation. In the beginning, evil was simply “outside” creation, “outside” existence, and anything that is outside creation or existence as a whole is simply uncreated or non-existent; in short, it is “nothing.”

          In other words, when evil “entered” creation, it had no choice but to be parasitic upon the good, just like the hole in the doughnut – that “lack” in the center in the doughnut – is parasitic upon the doughnut itself. Disease is ultimately presupposing the same good health that it is ruining, death is ultimately presupposing the life it is killing, crime is ultimately presupposing the good social order that it is corrupting, and so on. Evil, then, is just a privation of a good.

          This may shed light as to why God’s word speaks very positively about wine and even its abundance during the time of the Messiah’s coming! Maybe the reason we think it’s strange that the Bible seems to speak in a favorable way about getting intoxicated is that we are focusing on a very natural, very worldly, and thus a very corrupted image of intoxication, namely the standard type of drunkenness we experience from excessively drinking alcohol. Yes, this might be the initial image that the Bible (and the saints and mystics throughout Church history) wants us to think about. But maybe they are trying to use this initial image in order for them to point us to the supernatural, heavenly, and redeemed image of intoxication, namely the type of intoxication that comes from being consumed by that mad divine Love that only God can provide! To put it differently, they are trying to show us that the evil of drunkenness is ultimately parasitic on the good of being absorbed and being drunk on God’s saving grace. The former is simply a privation, a bastardization, a parody, of the latter. This may be the reason why, although the Scriptures use wine as an image, the Song of Songs ultimately says that the bridegroom’s love is “better than wine.” In the end, his love transcends wine, though it may be used as a starting image.

          In light of this realization, we now see the wisdom behind the wine/intoxication imagery of the Song of Songs. We now see that getting “intoxicated” with “wine” is not problematic at all, as long it is the “intoxication” that comes from the “wine” of the bridegroom, his love, his self-gift, instead of its bastardization that comes from excessively drinking alcohol.

It is in the Bible that we learn that we can get drunk even though remaining “alcohol-free.” It is in God that the saints get immersed into the sea of that divine Liquor which has consumed them. Yes, unlike the earthly wine that is consumed by us, the heavenly wine has us consumed, has us embraced by it, it’s sweetness and warmth. It is in God that we can truly say “I’m drunk in and through You” instead of simply saying “I’m drunk in and through it.” The overindulgence we experience in the Christian mystical life is an overindulgence over a Personal Being, with every impersonal wine paling to even let us fathom such a gift.

          And analogous to natural intoxication, this supernatural intoxication can influence our thinking and willing, but instead of clouding or blurring them, they become more empowered instead. Our thinking is divinized because the Truth now has set us free (John 8:32) and Love has now allowed us to “(rejoice) in the truth” (1 Corinthians 13:6). Our willing is supernaturalized because charity now allows us to “(endure) all things” (1 Corinthians 13:7).

          Once again, analogous to natural intoxication, supernatural intoxication makes us “step outside ourselves” and lose our identity, but instead of destroying them, they become integrated in a higher “identity” instead. Rather than merely existing as an “I,” Love authorizes us to exist in as a “we:” us and God, and me and you; love of God and love of neighbor (Matthew 22:36-40). “On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” And in losing ourselves, in dying to ourselves, we start to live for others and more importantly, for God. Such is the essence of love. You never know true love unless you know what it means for your own ego to die. “Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it” (Matthew 10:39).

          Such is the intoxicating love of the bridegroom. Such is the love that allows us to reach into the depths of God’s very heart. Yet remember that, in the end, earthly wines are nothing compared to it. Earthly wines are simply poor previews of what we can have when we are “overtaken… by God’s ‘crazy love for us.’”[ii] Lord our God, may we be drunk in You, drunk in Your amazing Love. May we realize that resting in your intoxicating presence will never be enough.

          As Saint Teresa of Avila has written:

Well, then, let (the bride) drink as much as she desires and get drunk on all these wines in the cellar of God! Let her enjoy these joys, wonder at these great things, and not to fear to lose her life through drinking much more than her weak nature enables her to do. Let her die at last in this paradise of delights; blessed death that makes one live in such a way.[iii]

          “You’re my… wine… I’m drunk in you,” says TWICE. We can only achieve this only if we “drink as much as (we) desire and get drunk on all (the) wines in the cellar of God!” TWICE has given a musical rendition of the bliss that comes from being ecstatic with God’s consuming Love (whether they realize it or not), but it is Saint Teresa of Avila who not only gave us the means to attain it, but is also someone who attained it! TWICE understood the wine imagery, but Teresa is the one who lived it. Saint Teresa of Avila, through your intercession, may God lead us to His heavenly wine cellar so that we can get drunk in His wines.

          It isn’t just Saint Teresa who appreciated the wine imagery in Scripture. There’s a ton of saints throughout the history of Christianity that did. But, in particular, I would also want to highlight another Carmelite saint: John of the Cross.

          Saint John of the Cross saw wine as a symbolism of God and the soul’s self-surrender to each other in love:

In the interior wine cellar of love (God and the soul, symbolized by the Bridegroom and Bride) were joined by the communication he made of himself to her... In that sweet drink of God, in which the soul is imbibed in him, she most willingly and with intense delight surrenders herself wholly to him in the desire to be totally his and never to possess in herself anything other than him... (S)he is really and totally given to God without keeping anything back, just as God has freely given himself entirely to her.[iv]

What does one commonly do when he or she drinks wine? He or she rests on the wine’s presence. He or she simply enjoys the moment and surrenders his or her whole self to the delight that’s experienced in wine. Nothing else exists, just me (and some friends, perhaps) and the wine.

Like our experience with wine, our encounter with divine Love simply allows us to rest in its magnificent power. As God has surrendered Himself to us, so too do we drop our defenses and give in to Him, as the bridegroom and the bride succumb to each other’s embrace and simply rest on each other’s affection. This is what makes Christianity great: it allows us not only to rest in God, but also for God to rest in us too, and this divine Resting in our souls is a force that compels us to see the world as God sees it and thus to love it as God commands us to. Just as falling in love changes our point of view in life, so too when we fall in love with God, the world suddenly becomes lovable, because we realize in a deep way that the world bears His stamp, because He created it, loved it into being: “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (John 13:34-35). This is the effect of drinking the divine Wine: to realize that God’s falling in love consists in creating you and your neighbor and for you to love another. This is the heart of Christian discipleship.

May we, by God’s “intoxicating” grace, continue to “chug” from the bottle of His heavenly Wine, the Wine of His saving divine charity.

 

“You are… my wine… I’m drunk in You.”

 



[i] Fulton Sheen, Life of Christ (Doubleday 2008, 1958), p. 17

[ii] Pope Benedict XVI, General Audience, November 26, 2008, as cited in Christopher West, Fill These Hearts: God, Sex, And The Universal Longing (Random House, 2012), p. 41

[iii] Blaise Arminjon, SJ, The Cantata of Love: A Verse by Verse Reading of The Song of Songs (Ignatius Press, 1988), p. 71, cited in West, Fill These Hearts, p. 39

[iv] St. John of the Cross, Spiritual Canticle, Commentary on st. B 27, par. 5-7, in Pope John Paul II, Man and Woman He Created Them: A Theology of the Body, Translation, Introduction, and Index by Michael Waldstein (Daughters of St. Paul 2006, 1997)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DOES GOD EXIST? Matt vs Mar (Written Debate) Matt's opening statement

THE NEW KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT [i] ML Antero ( Opening Remarks for Written Debate) I.                  On William Lane Craig’s Kalam Cosmological Argument Before I proceed in making my case for what I would call “the new Kalam Cosmological Argument”, I would like first to thank “Mar”, one of the admins of the Facebook page Atheism in the Philippines , for agreeing to participate in this written debate. As rational animals, to be able to think about philosophical topics such as the one we’re doing in this debate is one unique ability of man. I appreciate the fact that he is gracious enough to agree to exercise with me this majestic ability through discussing the existence of God. One of the hardest things to do today, due to the “Snowflake” and “Cancel” culture, is to have an intelligent discussion between peoples while setting aside each of their biases and feelings and properly assessing the arguments of the other side. Hopefully, both I and “Mar” would be able to pull of

Wanna Make Things Right? Stop Prioritizing Justice

  Image by  Jill Wellington  from  Pixabay It seems to me that there is an intuitive sense within us fallen human beings to prioritize justice in a cold, blind sense before everything else. Yes, even before love or friendship, we aim to make sure that we are given our due and that people who have hurt us should be hurt as well, so that he or she can feel what we also felt. For instance, if we learn that a person we consider a friend is actually stabbing us in the back, the reasonable response seems to be to break the friendship apart and complain about this same friend to other people. This seems what is just in our eyes. And for us, as long as our sense of blind justice is preserved, all will be well. But for Christ, making things right does not mean prioritizing justice in the retributive sense of the word. Rather, for Him, justice is merely secondary to gratuitous, no-holds-barred Divine Mercy. Mercy always and everywhere is primary. Only when Mercy precedes justice can things be ma

A Man Motivated By Love

Image by  Francesco Nigro  from  Pixabay First, a word about the 1988 movie The Truman Show starring Jim Carrey.  In the said movie, the main character, Truman Burbank (played by Carrey) lived in the biggest studio ever, which he thought was the real world, since he was the baby. Basically, everything around him is fake. He would interact with other people in his "island" not knowing they were simply paid actors. In short, he is living a life ruled by deception.  But there was a moment in his life where he met a woman named "Lauren" (whose real name is Sylvia), and fell in love with her. Lauren was also the first person in the whole show to tell Truman that he was living a lie, because in reality, she is a member of the "Free Truman" movement. Unfortunately, so that Truman would not know the truth, "Lauren" was taken off the show. To make the long story short, she became the motivating factor for Truman to leave his Island, a voyage which would u