Skip to main content

Love Intensified: Theological reflection on the sufferings of Jesus Christ

 

        The Lord Jesus is, as the Church affirms, the eternal Son of God, one in being with the Father and therefore shares the one, unique, and utterly transcendent divine nature with the Father and the Holy Spirit. At the same time, this same God the Son took upon Himself a human nature as an integral part of his mission as Divine Savior.[i] In becoming man and in accomplishing His work of redemption and manifesting His true identity through it, we shouldn’t just neglect the reality of His humanity and what followed from his human life and history. It is to this reality which I aim to focus on in this essay. Specifically, given its fittingness to be discussed at this time (the Holy Week), I would like to give a reflection on the pains and agony that our Blessed Lord experienced in His passion, the aches He suffered in His body and mind.

          The fact that Jesus Himself is able to suffer in His body during his earthly life is not a concept alien to the Sacred Pages, but is in fact taught explicitly in them. Saint Matthew recounts a time when Jesus referred to Himself as being “sorrowful to the point of death” while talking to His disciples at Gethsemane.[ii] The author of Hebrews likewise wrote that the Lord, in His passion, “offered up prayers and petitions with fervent cries and tears” to the Father[iii], a description that won’t make sense unless He Himself was in pain.

          Once again, we see here a scriptural of the truth of Christ’s humanity, that he really “dwelt among us” and “made one of us, like us in all things except sin”[iv]. And given that He is sinless, He had human defects in His earthly life not by inheriting it from the fallen Adam, but because He voluntarily took it upon Himself. He assumed them precisely to heal them. As Saint Thomas Aquinas himself has written in the Summa Theologiae: “(S)ince Christ healed the passibility and corruptibility of our body by assuming it, He consequently healed all other defects.”[v] It is true that Aquinas also taught that the earthly, pre-resurrection Christ possessed the beatific vision, but he also believed that Christ possessed it according to a specific dispensatio that would preserve the ordinariness of His physical body, sensation, consciousness and experiential knowledge.[vi] This includes His mortality and capacity to feel pain of all possible sorts, made manifest in His own suffering and death. Again, all of this was done out of his soteriological mission. It was all done out of love for you and I.

          Dominican priest and theologian Fr. Thomas Joseph White, OP in his book, The Incarnate Lord: A Thomistic Study in Christology[vii], distinguishes three dimensions of Christ’s agony. The first pertains to the form of punishment he endured, which is public torture and execution by way of crucifixion. The second (which is connected to our point above) is about His assumption of human defects which are consequences of human sin without being defective or sinful Himself, which includes “the fear of mortality, deep sadness, and a loss of the sense of the consoling presence of God.”[viii] The third dimension concerns his prophetic, extraordinary insight into the human condition, such that He is radically aware of mankind’s separation from and neglection of God. This form of awareness, coupled with the fullness of charity in his heart for all men, will indeed produce a radical grief in Christ.

          When we speak about Jesus’ agony from his crucifixion, we just don’t mean the pains coming from the crucifixion as such. We also have to take into account the events that happened prior that lead to and simultaneously with the crucifixion event. This includes the betrayal of Judas, one of His close friends and a disciple[ix], the fleeing of the other disciples[x], the mocking and other forms of disrespect done to Him by the soldiers who were in charge of punishing him[xi], the unjust judgment and condemnation of Him by the Sanhedrin[xii], Simon Peter’s denial of Him[xiii], seeing His mother grieve for Him as He hangs in the cross[xiv], and many more. Just imagine: the very people that you called friends and that you loved so much[xv], who walked with you and became close to you, suddenly fled and weren’t there in your worst moments. If that cannot be a source of great sorrow, what is? Also, consider the fact that Christ experienced these in a most severe way given the perfection of his human nature. Aquinas explains that, “(given that) His body was endowed with the most perfect constitution… Christ’s sense of touch, the sensitiveness of which is the reason for our feeling pain, was most acute. His soul, likewise, from its interior powers, apprehended most vehemently all the causes of sadness.”[xvi]

          Given the perfection of His humanity (due to the fact that He was “full of grace and truth”[xvii]), His body and soul is able to absorb the pain, discomfort, and affliction in the most extreme way. Every mockery and curse He heard, every laceration He received from the flagellation[xviii], every spit and slap they threw in His face[xix], every puncture and penetration in His head that He felt from the crown of thorns[xx], every sting coming from the nails in His hands and feet[xxi]: All of these He endured with full absorption. The darkness and gore of the passion was assumed by him in its fullness, given the magnificence of His humanity. And all of it was experienced with an eye towards the salvation of us all. All was done for you and I. How awesome is this divine benevolence, revealed in the physical and mental pains of the God-man! Saint Paul said it best: “God demonstrates His own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”[xxii]

          When it comes to the second dimension of Christ’s agony, the theological discussion on its origins is very complicated. We have to ask the question: What is the root cause of Christ’s capacity to get hurt, whether physically or spiritually? We have already given a brief answer above, suggesting that God the Son assumed our defects out of love. So far, that’s uncontroversial. But what exactly are the intricacies of the Son’s act of love that led to his assuming of a human nature with its notable flaws, including the capacity to die? Many theologians thought that this is due to an eternal act of obedience in the very life of the Trinity, which would seem that the Son in His very deity is involved in an eternal subordination to the Father.[xxiii] Connected to this is the idea that, in revealing His subordination to the Father, Christ becomes “disconnected” from the Father on the cross. The Father “forsakes” Jesus in His crucifixion, taking our place, in order to suffer damnation. The idea is that we are supposed to be the one that deserves hell, but now Christ took the pains of hell to himself to save us from it.[xxiv]

Like I have mentioned, a deep look on this kenotic Christology that is prominent in modern theology today is complicated and cannot be settled here. I would just say, though, that I do not adhere to modern kenoticism in describing the identity and mission of the earthly Christ. When analyzed correctly, it not only poses problems for God’s internal unity and the oneness of will in the Father and the Son[xxv], but the idea of Christ’s alienation from God in His passion which allowed Him to experience damnation is just unintelligible, at least for me. Fr. White writes, “If God the Son were to forfeit his divine unity with the Father in the crucifixion, his capacity to save us would not only be compromised, but in fact forfeited.”[xxvi]

Add to this the fact that damnation is precisely the privation of love, whereas love is precisely the reason why God the Son became incarnate[xxvii] (“God is Love”, “For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son…”).[xxviii] We cannot therefore predicate damnation (or even despair) in Christ because it is the precise opposite of the purpose of His identity and mission. We cannot even predicate it analogously, then, even if the effects of Christ’s assumed defects are somehow similar to that of a damned soul or a sinful man (we can therefore compare them metaphorically, even if we cannot predicate things in them univocally or analogously).

There’s more to say about the topic, but we can settle for what has been said so far. Jesus cannot experience damnation, which is punishment that follows from a deliberate rejection of God, because Jesus did it all out of love. Love for the Father (expressed in a human way) and, consequently, love for us.

It’s important that we reiterate that Christ, though having the beatific vision, possessed it in a way that did not overcome the reality of his sufferings. It is true that, typically, the joy of the beatific vision not only exists in a spiritual way but also permeates the body. In the case of the earthly Christ, however, there is a miraculous suspension of this, wherein the extraordinary and immediate vision of God only exists within His higher reason, in way that doesn’t dabble with the reality of His human pain.[xxix] This is all for the sake of his soteriological mission: “He was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed.”[xxx] The God-man, through the reality of His human nature, has assumed the defects that would allow Him to be subject to suffering and death, made most manifest as He is lifted up on the cross, the new tree of life, recreating the world destroyed by the sin of the first Adam.

Lastly, there’s Christ’s pain stemming from his great insight to the weight of human sin. How is this possible? Aquinas explains that this “flowed from a greater wisdom and charity, by which the pang of contrition is intensified, and because He grieved at the one time for all sins, according to Is 53:4: ‘Surely He has borne our sorrows’”[xxxi].

The scriptures themselves testify that, even before the cross, Jesus at times would experience sorrow on behalf of others. John 11:35, the shortest verse in Scripture, only says “Jesus wept”. This was during the time Jesus learned that his friend Lazarus is dead. A closer example of what Aquinas is trying to point out though, is found in Luke 19:41-44, where Jesus wept over Jerusalem and its fate.[xxxii]

At first, it may seem that Jesus is only weeping over the future downfall of Jerusalem that will be caused by a foreign invasion or something like so. But, reading it in the context of the proceeding verses that speak of Jesus cleansing the temple, it can be read in the sense that Jesus is weeping for Jerusalem’s spiritual downfall, or their downfall due to sin, as exhibited by the people’s misuse of the temple. Christ, then, had this amazing insight into our hearts that allowed Him to truly see the wretchedness of our fallen nature. This has led him to be moved in sorrow through contrition, not for Himself, but for us.

This is of course most evident in His cry for forgiveness for His executioners: “Father, forgive them for they don’t know what they do” (Luke 23:34). What you see here is a cry for deliverance for others, even in the midst of one’s own suffering.

This is an interesting part of Christ’s agony because this is not an agony that stems from His own experience of Himself, but rather from the condition of others. And what more could you ask for, if you want to see an example of Christ’s fullness of charity? Add to this the fact that, given His prophetic insight, He mourned for all sins of all people of all time and space. Saint Paul, in his letter to the Galatians, wrote that “I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself up for me”.[xxxiii] You cannot love what you don’t know, which means that Christ loved Paul because Christ knew Paul (even if they never met during the earthly life and public ministry of Christ). Christ knew Paul and therefore knew the condition of Paul – his sinful condition. There’s nothing different in this case when it comes to us. Long before we were all born, the Incarnate God knew of the bondage that takes hold of our souls. He knew you, long before you even knew yourself, long before you realized the reality of your sinfulness. And in knowing you, He loved you. And in loving you in your sinful state, His love has increased the suffering in Him, the ache of wanting to liberate you from the dirt you’re in. Even Saint Peter pointed this out: “Christ suffered for you”.[xxxiv] We should never forget the ever great, ever beautiful transforming love of Christ on the personal level. Let’s not just proclaim that Christ suffered, but that He suffered for us, confronting sin and death in its face, the same sin and death that you and I are subject to, but are now able to rise above it, because God Himself, in solidarity with us in His humanity, has rose above it.

“Greater love has no one than this: to lay down one’s life for His friends.”[xxxv] The Christian life is an invitation of intimate friendship, built on radical love, with God: “I made your name known to them, and I will make it known, so that the love with which you have loved me may be in them, and I in them.”[xxxvi] In suffering for our sins, the Lord Himself has taken the first step. God, in becoming incarnate and taking upon Himself the consequences of sin, has already stretched out His hand to us, in order to pull us out of the dark realm of sin. We have rebelled against the Lord, or, as Peter Kreeft would put it, “we are born divorced”. The sufferings of Christ in His flesh and spirit, sufferings that He took for you and I, gives us a brand-new opportunity to enter into a brand-new relationship with God and to be able to participate in His marriage supper in the end of time.[xxxvii]

This also calls for a greater charity for our brothers and sisters. Every time you encounter another person, always keep in mind that this person is extremely loved by the Lord, to the point of being willing to die for him or her. We have no right to hate others (this is a commandment after all), precisely because the God of the universe, in His earthly life and beyond (and even before it, since He is the eternal Son), didn’t hate others. God is Love. You were made by Love and for Love. The agony of Jesus has provided you a blueprint in fulfilling your destiny.

I also want to give a brief word on contrition. The fact that sin is the very reason why God took upon Himself our human defects and thereby has suffered and died because of it should be reason enough to move us to repentance. Sin executed God. You are a sinner. All of us have been, in one way or another, killers of the Lord. God, in His mysterious providence, has allowed man to commit deicide, the greatest of all crimes. It is fitting that, from time to time, we dwell into this great mystery and allow ourselves to “sink” into the truth of God’s humanly agony. This is a great opportunity for us to be sorry for our sins, to bend our knees before God and to look down and weep before Him Who Loved, before Him Who hanged on the cross. We in the modern world have lacked the quality of a contrite heart. Many Catholics (and Christians in general) may think that the story of the Lord’s passion is too familiar to them, too banal, that they have forgotten the great advantages in reflecting on Christ’s sufferings. May this modern inclination be changed. Hopefully, by God’s grace, our lives may once again radiate this great mystery, reflected in our words and actions.

May we, not only this Good Friday but for the rest of our lives, continue to meditate on the reality of Jesus’s sufferings. Let us never forget the fact that God has already gave us a battle plan contra eternal damnation, presented to us via the physical wounds and mental and emotional pain that Christ experienced through the punishment inflicted in Him and His love and knowledge of us.

 



[i] John 1:14

[ii] Matthew 26:38

[iii] Hebrews 5:7

[iv] Hebrews 4:15

[v] ST III q. 14, a. 4 ad. 1

[vi] ST III q. 14, a. 1 ad 2

[vii] Thomas Joseph White, OP, The Incarnate Lord: A Thomistic Study in Christology (Catholic University of America Press, 2015)

[viii] Ibid., 331, White clarifies that this is in no way interpreted in terms commonly associated with penal substitutionary atonement theory, in the sense that Jesus experienced damnation or separation from God on the cross.

[ix] Mark 14:44-46

[x] Mark 14:50-52

[xi] Matthew 27:27-31

[xii] Matthew 26:57-67

[xiii] Matthew 26:69-75

[xiv] John 19:25-27

[xv] John 13:34, 15:15

[xvi] ST III, q. 46, a. 6

[xvii] John 1:14

[xviii] John 19:1

[xix] Mathew 26:67

[xx] Mark 15:17

[xxi] Luke 23:26-43

[xxii] Romans 5:8

[xxiii] See Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics (CD) IV, 1, 209: “In His mode of being as the Son He fulfills the divine subordination, just as the Father in His mode of being as the Father fulfills the divine superiority. In humility as the Son who complies, He is the same as is the Father in majesty as the Father who disposes.”

[xxiv] CD IV, 1, 238. Also see Hans Urs Von Balthasar, Theo-Drama, 4:325, wherein Balthasar articulates his view on the “dark and bitter” separation of the Son from the Father.

[xxv] See White, Intra-Trinitarianism and Nicene-Chalcedonian Christology, Nova et Vetera, English Edition, Vol. 6, No. 2 (2008), 377-402

[xxvi] The Incarnate Lord, p. 373

[xxvii] Ibid., 311-320

[xxviii] 1 John 4:8, John 3:16

[xxix] ST III, q. 14, a. 1, ad 2: “From the natural relationship which is between the soul and the body, glory flows into the body from the soul’s glory. Yet this natural relationship in Christ was subject to the will of His Godhead, and thereby it came to pass that the beatitude remained in the soul, and did not flow into the body; but the flesh suffered what belongs to a passible nature.” The distinction Aquinas makes between Christ’s higher and reason isn’t a distinction between two intellects in Christ’s humanity, but rather a distinction between two distinct objects, namely, the immediate vision of God and bodily/cognitive realities that are subject to suffering. See ST III, q. 46, aa. 7-8

[xxx] Isaiah 53:5

[xxxi]  ST III, q. 46, a. 6, ad 4

[xxxii] And when he drew near and saw the city, he wept over it, saying, “Would that you, even you, had known on this day the things that make for peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes. For the days will come upon you, when your enemies will set up a barricade around you and surround you and hem you in on every side and tear you down to the ground, you and your children within you. And they will not leave one stone upon another in you, because you did not know the time of your visitation.”

[xxxiii] Galatians 2:20

[xxxiv] 1 Peter 2:21

[xxxv] John 15:13

[xxxvi] John 17:26

[xxxvii] Revelation 19:9


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wanna Make Things Right? Stop Prioritizing Justice

  Image by  Jill Wellington  from  Pixabay It seems to me that there is an intuitive sense within us fallen human beings to prioritize justice in a cold, blind sense before everything else. Yes, even before love or friendship, we aim to make sure that we are given our due and that people who have hurt us should be hurt as well, so that he or she can feel what we also felt. For instance, if we learn that a person we consider a friend is actually stabbing us in the back, the reasonable response seems to be to break the friendship apart and complain about this same friend to other people. This seems what is just in our eyes. And for us, as long as our sense of blind justice is preserved, all will be well. But for Christ, making things right does not mean prioritizing justice in the retributive sense of the word. Rather, for Him, justice is merely secondary to gratuitous, no-holds-barred Divine Mercy. Mercy always and everywhere is primary. Only when Mercy precedes justice can things be ma

A Man Motivated By Love

Image by  Francesco Nigro  from  Pixabay First, a word about the 1988 movie The Truman Show starring Jim Carrey.  In the said movie, the main character, Truman Burbank (played by Carrey) lived in the biggest studio ever, which he thought was the real world, since he was the baby. Basically, everything around him is fake. He would interact with other people in his "island" not knowing they were simply paid actors. In short, he is living a life ruled by deception.  But there was a moment in his life where he met a woman named "Lauren" (whose real name is Sylvia), and fell in love with her. Lauren was also the first person in the whole show to tell Truman that he was living a lie, because in reality, she is a member of the "Free Truman" movement. Unfortunately, so that Truman would not know the truth, "Lauren" was taken off the show. To make the long story short, she became the motivating factor for Truman to leave his Island, a voyage which would u

Saint Thomas Aquinas, My Beloved Professor in Heaven: The four most important lessons I learned from the Angelic Doctor

                 It’s been three years since I first discovered and seriously personally studied the works of Saint Thomas Aquinas, and I can happily say that I am far from really scratching the surface. The Angelic Doctor has this awe-inspiring gift of deep insight when it comes to philosophical and theological truths; this great awareness of both the metaphysics of the cosmos and the infinite divine power and love that moves the planets, of both what things are in themselves and He Who Is, of the words that come from the wisdom of antiquity and the Word that breathes forth Love, Who is the Logos of God through Which the Father expresses His design in creation and through Which the Father recreates us in redemption. In short, Aquinas’s thought is this one, big, wholesome vision of God, our First Cause and Last End, and His mysterious and astonishing relationship with the universe that one cannot really claim to be an “expert” when it comes to his teachings (one can have a specialty in